The William Rose family, based on census records, had six
children. We have Julia, Eva, Joseph, William Jenny and the youngest Mabel.
Searching for records to validate information showed three more children who
were born to them. One is listed on the 1880 census as one month old. The other
two aren’t documented. Without the 1890 census, so many people have fallen
through the proverbial cracks. Did the two missing children, twins, belong to
my family or one of the other William and Malenda/Matilda families. I accepted there
were only six children in the family. I recognize that there was one more. But the other two children bothered me. Who
did they belong to? One family tree showed one of those children in their Ancestry
tree, but not the other six shown above. Why isn’t there any other record
except from a birth or death record?
The good news, if there can be on in this instance, is that
the children were born in 1880 and the twins in 1887. All three
died in 1889. Causes of death included croup, blood poisoning and cholera
infantum, most easy to cure in later generations. With the 1890 census
destroyed, there would have been no accounting for them.
So now I have nine children accounted for. Where is the
tenth? Could it be a stillborn child not reported, a miscarriage? Will I ever
find that last child?
No comments:
Post a Comment